På fredag 17. juni 2016 kl. 13:53:34, skrev Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:På torsdag 16. juni 2016 kl. 00:50:45, skrev Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx>:On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi.First; Is this the correct forum to ask questions about the Postgres Pro's new RUM-index?If not, please point me to the right forum.I think that https://github.com/postgrespro/rum/issues might be the best forum.Oleg and friends; Should we use GitHub-issues as forum (one issue per question/thread?), pgsql-general or something else?Andreas,
we are hardly working on our internal version of rum and will open it after resolving some issues. I think the best place to discuss it is -hackers.Ah, as someone corrected me, we are working hard !
He he, I figured that was what you meant:-)
Ok, so basically - will RUM-index support the same indexing-properties as GIN (being able to index tsvector, BIGINT-arrays, JSONB etc.) and be able to use index for sorting on ie. timestamp, tsrank or some BIGINT-column?
Like my example, will it be possible to issue a query like this:
SELECT del.id
, del.sent
FROM delivery del
WHERE 1 = 1
AND del.fts_all @@ to_tsquery('simple', 'hi:*')
AND del.folder_id = ANY(ARRAY[2,3]::BIGINT[])
ORDER BY del.sent DESC LIMIT 101 OFFSET 0;
and have it use one RUM-index so the whole operation, including sorting, is as efficient as possible?
Thanks.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
