Search Postgresql Archives

ALTER TABLE and vacuum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: ALTER TABLE and vacuum
From: Rick Widmer <pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 02:55:35 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1

Do I need to vacuum after an alter table command?

Does it matter if there is a default or if we accept NULLs for the newfield?



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ALTER TABLE and vacuum
  - From: Vik Fearing

Prev by Date: Re: Replication
Next by Date: Re: ALTER TABLE and vacuum
Previous by thread: How SQL SELECT * statement works in Postgres?
Next by thread: Re: ALTER TABLE and vacuum
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux