Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Slave claims requested WAL segment already removed - but it wasn't

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/01/2016 06:43 PM, Jeff Beck wrote:
Hi-
We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on
Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining
that the “requested WAL segment xxxxxx has already been removed”. But
the WAL segment was still on the master. The issue was resolved by
manually copying the pg_xlog directory over to the slave.

What is your setup?:

1) Streaming

2) WAL archiving

3) Both

4) Do you have more then one standby?


I don’t see any errors on the master log file, or any other messages on
the slave’s. What happened? How can this be prevented in the future?

Thanks,
Jeff






--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux