On 17 May 2016 at 10:22, Achilleas Mantzios <achill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 17/05/2016 12:16, Geoff Winkless wrote: >> >> On 17 May 2016 at 09:34, Pierre Chevalier Géologue >> <pierrechevaliergeol@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On this matter, I hear *very* often from such guys that the only reproach >>> they have to PostgreSQL is that it does not come with a slick GUI like >>> Access. PGAdmin does not suit their needs at all: they want to design >>> their >>> forms, directly write into the tables by using quick'n easy/dirty >>> copy/paste >>> from/to their Excel (yes, it is still lying around). I understand them, >>> somehow. >>> There are a few tools around, many proprietary ones, some Free/Libre >>> ones, >>> but they are still looking for a sort of Holy Grail that would definitely >>> convince them. A standard client tool that would come with any >>> PostgreSQL >>> installation would please them. Some sort of psqlGUI, I guess. >> >> Why reinvent the wheel? I would say that putting the development >> effort into the OpenOffice Base app would be time better spent. > > Sorry if I missed something but what's wrong with pgadmin3 ? There's nothing wrong with pgadmin as such. >From the very email you just quoted: >>> they want to design their forms ie (as I understand it) they're after some sort of RAD tool. Geoff -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
