Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Fast way to delete big table?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/15/2016 10:33 PM, Haiming Zhang wrote:
Hi Gavin,

Thanks for the suggestion. What you said was what I tried to do (except
the last reindexes, planned to do it when the table is cleaned up),
however it was too slow. I have run for two days, nothing much happened.

From your original post I gathered you did not do what Gavin suggested. In that you dropped the indexes first and the combined the UPDATE summary and DELETE row into one operation. So I am little confused on what you are asking. Are you look for suggestions on what to do in the future or how to make the existing condition(no indexes on the big table) work better or both?


Truncate does not work for my purpose.

Regards,
Haiming




	

*Haiming Zhang* | Engineer | *Redflex Group*
*T* +61 3 9674 1868 | *F* +61 3 9699 3566 | *E*
Haiming.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
31 Market Street, (PO Box 720), South Melbourne VIC 3205, Australia

If you are not an authorised recipient of this e-mail, please contact me
at Redflex immediately by return phone call or by email. In this case,
you should not read, print, retransmit, store or act in reliance on this
e-mail or any attachments, and should destroy all copies of them. This
e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may contain privileged
information and/or copyright material of Redflex or third parties. You
should only retransmit, distribute or commercialise the material if you
are authorised to do so. This notice should not be removed.






-----Original Message-----
From: Gavin Flower [mailto:GavinFlower@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2016 3:24 PM
To: Haiming Zhang <Haiming.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Fast way to delete big table?

On 16/05/16 17:09, Haiming Zhang wrote:

Hi All,

I have a big table (200G with 728 million records), the table slows
down lots of things. It's time to clean the data up. The requirement
is when I delete I must summarise few columns to a new table for
backup purpose. So that mean I need to go through each row and add the
columns' value to the summary table (the corresponding category).

The table has indexes (multicoumn indexes) before, I removed the
indexes because I read on forum says the indexes *heavily* reduce the
speed of deleting. That's true if I only delete from the table, but my
case is I first SELECT this row, then add few values to the summary
table and then DELETE the row according to its multiple primary key.
This seems to be a bad idea now as it takes very long time to DELETE
the row (as delete needs to find the row first).

Here are the two version of the delete functions, please help to point
out how can I speed it up.

1.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION summary_delete_table()

RETURNS integer AS

$BODY$

DECLARE

rec                     RECORD;

subrec                  RECORD;

BEGIN

FOR rec IN SELECT * FROM tableA limit 100 LOOP

BEGIN

UPDATE summaryTable set count1 = rec.count1 + rec.count1, count2 =...
where category match;

delete from tableA where tableA.primaryKeyA=rec.primaryKeyA and
tableA.primaryKeyB=rec.primaryKeyB;

END;

END LOOP;

return 1;

END;

$BODY$

LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE

COST 100;

And then I have a .bat script to loop the above function million times.

2.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION summary_delete_table()

RETURNS integer AS

$BODY$

DECLARE

rec                     RECORD;

td_cursor            CURSOR FOR SELECT * FROM tableA limit 100;

BEGIN

FOR rec IN td_cursor LOOP

BEGIN

UPDATE summaryTable set count1 = rec.count1 + rec.count1, count2 =...
where category match;

delete from tableA WHERE CURRENT OF td_cursor;

END;

END LOOP;

return 1;

END;

$BODY$

LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE

COST 100;

Method 2 is bit faster but not much, the delete speed is 2478 rows/s
for method 2 and 2008 rows/s for method 1.

Any suggestions are welcomed.

BTW, I guess if reindex, it may take few days to finish.

Also, I tried change delete 100 rows at a time and 1000, 2000. The
result showed 1000 is faster than 100 and 2000 a time.

Thanks and Regards,

Haiming

[...]

In one transaction:

 1. populate the summary table
 2. drop indexes on tableA
 3. delete selected entries in tableA
 4. recreate indexes for tableA

If deleting all entries, then simply truncate it!

N.B. I have NOT checked the fine print in the documentation, nor tested
this - so be warned!  :-)


Cheers,
Gavin




--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux