On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As Jeff points out I'd have a much larger win in this instance by > someone spending the time implementing skip index scans rather than > messing with the planner :) But I think the hardest part of implementing skip index scans would probably be getting the planner to understand the cost of using them! So one way or another, the planner has to get messed with. Cheers, Jeff -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
