On 02/12/2016 04:03 PM, AI Rumman wrote:
In pg_subtrans, I have files like:
Are you sure you are looking at the same database cluster in all the cases?
What does:
SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
give you?
$ ls -lrt | more
total 1269436
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 18:49 D907
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 18:54 D908
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 18:58 D909
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 18:59 D90A
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:04 D90B
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:09 D90C
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:14 D90D
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:18 D90E
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:19 D90F
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:24 D910
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:29 D911
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:33 D912
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:34 D913
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:39 D914
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:44 D915
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:49 D916
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:53 D917
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:54 D918
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 19:59 D919
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:04 D91A
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:09 D91B
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:14 D91C
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:19 D91D
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:23 D91E
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:24 D91F
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:29 D920
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:34 D921
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:39 D922
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:44 D923
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:49 D924
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:54 D925
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 20:59 D926
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 262144 Jan 25 21:04 D927
.....
Does it mean that I have too many open transactions? If yes, it is not
showing in pg_stat_activity.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:38 PM, AI Rumman <rummandba@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rummandba@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Used this query in each of the database::
SELECT t.relname, l.database, l.locktype, l.pid , l.mode, l.granted,
p.current_query, p.query_start ,p.waiting
FROM pg_locks as l
INNER JOIN pg_stat_all_tables t
on l.relation = t.relid
INNER JOIN pg_stat_activity as p
on l.pid = p.procpid ;
No luck. At present, db is working, but t is going towards wraparound.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Adrian Klaver
<adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 02/12/2016 03:10 PM, AI Rumman wrote:
I checked it and I did not find any log running sql or any open
transaction. Not even in pg_prepared_xacts.
And it looks like pg_catalog database is making the alarm.
Any other idea please, where I need to look into.
Should have added:
select * from pg_database
Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Adrian Klaver
<adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
On 02/12/2016 02:56 PM, AI Rumman wrote:
Hi,
I am running Postgresql 9.1 and I can see the
datfrozenxid is
going high
and vacuum process is not bringing it down. And
this has been
happening
on template1 database.
2016-02-12 16:51:50.400 CST [19445][@] :
[13-1] WARNING:
oldest
xmin is far in the past
2016-02-12 16:51:50.400 CST [19445][@] :
[14-1] HINT:
Close open
transactions soon to avoid wraparound problems.
The above seems to be the contributing factor.
Does:
select * from pg_stat_activity
show long running queries.
2016-02-12 16:51:50.400 CST [19445][@] :
[15-1] LOG: automatic
vacuum of table
"template1.pg_catalog.pg_database": index
scans: 0
pages: 0 removed, 1 remain
tuples: 0 removed, 9 remain
system usage: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec
2016-02-12 16:51:50.411 CST [19435][@] :
[82-1] WARNING:
oldest
xmin is far in the past
2016-02-12 16:51:50.411 CST [19435][@] :
[83-1] HINT:
Close open
transactions soon to avoid wraparound problems.
2016-02-12 16:51:50.411 CST [19435][@] :
[84-1] LOG: automatic
vacuum of table
"template1.pg_catalog.pg_largeobject":
index scans: 0
pages: 0 removed, 0 remain
tuples: 0 removed, 0 remain
system usage: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec
I vacuum database manually but nothing is working out.
Please help,
Thanks.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
