Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> Cmake 2 times faster, that is good, but I don't understand why. Which >> optimization level does cmake buld use by default? Which compiler does it >> take? It's not obvious, because cmake build hides actual compiler command >> line. > Hm, I don't think having the compile/link lines be hidden up is > acceptable. Many times we need to debug some compile problem, and the > output is mandatory. As long as it's *possible* to expose the commands, I see nothing wrong with hiding them by default. I personally almost always use "make -s" these days, and would not mind if that became the default behavior. But there had better be a switch to do the other thing. The other make switch I use all the time is -jN (with varying values of N depending on what machine I'm on). If cmake can't provide an equivalent feature, that would be a large minus, because if you have a decent number of cores -j makes a huge difference in build time. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
