On 02/01/2016 12:52 PM, Dane Foster wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
As an example of where this leads see:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7224.1452275604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the heads up. The good news is all machine access to the
data will be via functions and views so I can inline the constraint in
the right places. In other news, this sucks! I have no idea what it
I could see moving your constraint into a per row trigger.
would take to implement a more flexible constraint mechanism where these
types of dependencies can be expressed declaratively but it would be
great if someone w/ the know-how did. As is evident by the fact that I
wasn't the only one to not realize the rabbit hole I was heading down,
it would be a useful feature.
As always thanks for setting me straight,
Dane
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
