Hi Josh, I simply wrote in first person with the intention to catalyse thought about what could and or should and or should not be in such a "covenant". In no way was the email any statement of authority and I had hoped to make that clear, evidently not. Evidently it was not clear enough despite my disclaimer at the top. My sincere apologies for the confusion - such confusion was seriously not wanted by me and I apologise unreservedly. On the topic, I feel it will take a few years yet for "the libre software community" to come to anything approaching a consensus regarding "community covenant"; just my opinion of course. Regards, Zenaan On 1/26/16, Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mr. Harkness, > > First, the discussion you reference is now materially over. > > Second, you are not an administrator of this, or any other PostgreSQL > mailing list of which I am aware. As such, you are in no position to > dictate what is, or is not, acceptable on this list and will get someone > "banned"; only our Infra Team can do that. Please do not presume to do > so for them. > > -- > Josh Berkus > Red Hat OSAS > (opinions are my own) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
