Search Postgresql Archives

Re: A motion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Although it has been previously disregarded, I would like to second the motion that all further discussion regarding the CoC go to it's own list.

Consider this.
1. The Coc will eventually apply to ALL PostgreSQL mail lists.
2. There will be a need to have additions and revisions to the Coc.
3. As this list is for General (and mostly technical discussions) further discussions/emails concerning the CoC only distracts from the purpose of this email list.


​Complete agreement. I've kept my hands silent through force of will. Those who are interested can create a CoC to their heart's content. I will abide by it or not as I decide. But I try to be acceptably pleasant in all discussions, even when I disagree with someone. 

This thread has been a completely useless; requiring extreme use of my delete key.​
 

--
Werner Heisenberg is driving down the autobahn. A police officer pulls
him over. The officer says, "Excuse me, sir, do you know how fast you
were going?"
"No," replies Dr. Heisenberg, "but I know where I am."

Computer Science is the only discipline in which we view adding a new wing to a building as being maintenance -- Jim Horning

Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted.

He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux