Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Let's Do the CoC Right

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oliver Elphick wrote:
> (Replying to the digest post)
> 
> Having watched this discussion from the start, I think the project
> would be better off without any CoC.  The list has always been
> conducted well and if something isn't broken you shouldn't try to fix
> it.

FWIW, I agree that we don't need a CoC.

However, those of us who have never been attacked/abused would naturally
state that there have never been any attacks/abuses, and I believe
that's false -- in other words I believe some people would consider
themselves to have been attacked/abused, even if some external observers
might not necessarily agree that they were being attacked/abused.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux