On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 20 January 2016 at 20:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "which could be considered" is too open-ended. Since this point is
> the one and only that can cause enforcement to occur, it should be more
> strict as to what it is that will not be tolerated. I'd propose
> something like "is widely regarded as harassment" or something like
> that, so that it needs to be clear that there is a large group of people
> that considers the behavior unwanted rather than some minority.
The problem with _that_ is that on the internet of 3 billion people "a
large group of people" can be whipped up from a tiny minority.
At the end of the day this will require human judgment rather than formulation.
Human judgment may be flawed but in a culturally diverse group it is far better than the alternative.
Geoff
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
