"Tom, I like the way you handed this issue. Good work!" Is a personal comment.
Why do we need lists? What specifically is wrong with "that focuses on the tech and not the person" version?
Jim
On January 11, 2016 6:04:03 PM EST, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/11/2016 02:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:How about we meet in the middle:A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free
of non-technical or personal comments related to gender, sexual
orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race or
personal attacks.
That's not really meeting in the middle: it still specifies exactly
one set of disapproved topics. Might be OK if it read like
"... personal comments, for example ones related to gender, ..."
Tom,
Oh good point. I like that. So:
A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free
of non-technical or personal comments, for example ones related to
gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size,
race or personal attacks.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
