On 01/11/2016 01:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe <lr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
How would you feel about the original thread that started this.
https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941
I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to read a thread
with (when I looked) 374 messages, but if the gist of it is that
they have a code of conduct that attempts to control the speech or
actions of contributors outside of the venue of the lists or events
of the project, count me as -1, regardless of how offensive I might
find said speech or actions.
I didn't look at this one either, but I looked at the "contributor
covenant" Regina linked to earlier (as an example of what not to do) and
was shocked to see that any random outsider can *demand* a project admin
to take action on harassment accusations, or have *the admin* be removed
from the project. I found that totally backwards and I'd certainly be
against anything that contains such language.
You would never get me on board with that either. To iterate my thoughts
around a CoC are exactly this:
""" A CoC is about providing a safe, respectful, productive, and
collaborative place for any person who is willing to contribute in a
safe, respectful, productive and collaborative way.
A CoC is not about being offended. The act of being offended is purely a
recipients response and usually because the recipient is more interested
in being a victim than moving forward. """
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
