> We don't normally document back-patched patches in as-yet-unreleased > branches, since the point of release notes is to tell you what's new > compared to the previous release, and this item isn't (or won't be). That makes sense. > Also, I doubt that this is of any great concern to the average user. > It's not a scenario that would come up in anything I would call a > supported use-case. If we're to reverse the aforementioned policy, > there are probably quite a few patches that would now need to be > documented as "new in 9.5" and are more significant than this. It's possible that novice admins accidentally remove postmaster.pid (I saw this kind of incidents a few times while supporting customers if my memory serves). Anyway I am happy as long as it's clearly documented in the release notes of the next versions. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
