"Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@xxxxxx> writes: > Can those signals be safely ignored? Just blocking them (so that they > are delivered after the UDF finishes) might be safer. But even that may > be a problem: If the UDF then executes some SQL, could that rely on > signals being delivered? I have no idea. The minute you start fooling with a backend's signal behavior, we're going to politely refuse to support whatever breakage you run into. We aren't sending those signals just for amusement's sake. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
