-----Original Message----- From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:06 AM To: Day, David; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. On 11/19/2015 07:47 AM, Day, David wrote: > > > So what are you working on? > > The document you link to starts with this: > " > Examples of network devices that are covered by requirements in this cPP include routers, firewalls, VPN gateways, IDSs, and switches. ..." > > So embedded devices. Not sure how prevalent Postgres is in that area. > > Also the subsection you refer to seems to be talking only about memory, not storage which is where VACUUM FULL works. That may be an overly fine distinction, but one that can be made. > > >> >> Appreciate everyone's feedback. This is perhaps a matter that can feed into future OS ( FreeBSD ) and/or Postgress development. >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> Dave Day >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Adrian > > Our app/development is a softswitch, (VoIP), and is considered a network appliance. > Postgres in general has been a joy to learn and aside from a a hiccup > with plperl and FreeBSD (9.8) that the discussion board helped me resolve some time ago, dependable and problem free. I scanned the subsection you referred to, and before acronym fatigue set in, it seems to refer to in memory key handling during device authentication. Is your Postgres instance doing that? > > Dave > > > > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx Our app is doing the authentication based on the sensitive information retrieved from postgres tables. Our app zeros out its associated memory to the process when it is done with it. The developer was concerned about the breadcrumbs left in postgress volatile memory in satisfying the query. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
