On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:35 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/20/2015 1:22 PM, Dane Foster wrote:
Here is the updated version w/ the feedback incorporated. I'm going to install PostgreSQL 9.6 from source this weekend so I can start testing/debugging.
I would stick with developing/debugging on the current release version, 9.4. 9.6 isn't even in beta yet.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
We
are in the "let's think about how we wanna approach this" phase of
migration. So all we are doing now is researching and testing. In
essence we are playing. So by the time we get serious enough to reach
beta internally I suspect 9.6 should be in beta too. And if we happen to
be ready for production before 9.6 is ready there is always 9.5 which
will definitely be production ready before we are.
My
larger point is this. I've been lurking at the edge of the PostgreSQL
community for a couple years now and I finally have a project that has
PostgreSQL written all over it. But instead of just taking the "free software" and running w/ it I'd like to
participate and one of the things that PostgreSQL always needs is people
willing to use/test the bleeding edge of the code w/ "real" workloads. I hope to be able to
contribute in that area.
Regards,Dane
