On 4 September 2015 at 21:46, Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> FATAL: role "postgresql" does not exist >>> >>> It works if I init with "-U postgresql" > > The demo works fine if > I use the string "postgresql" as the admin role. It looks like you might > want to build -U support into bdr at some point. It's not at all clear to me how this is happening. The string "postgresql" isn't hardcoded by BDR anywhere that it could conceivably be passed as a username for a connection string, so I'm not sure what's going on. I've never used "postgresql" as the default superuser name. Typically I use "postgres". I don't see anything particularly informative in the main PostgreSQL sources that could explain it either. We pass "postgresql" as the PGSQL_PAM_SERVICE and use it as the default RADIUS identifier, but I fail to see how those could get passed as the login role identifier. Are you running it under a unix user named "postgresql", by any chance? -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
