Thanks you very much Craig for clearing these facts and sorry for mail sent only to you by mistake.
Amit Bondwal
--
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Bondwal
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 17 July 2015 at 19:37, Amit Bondwal <bondwal.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you very much all of you for quick response and clearing my mind.
Please reply to the mailing list, not just to me directly.
> One more question, can I run a databse of postgres 9.4 on postgres-XL
> cluster?
postgres-XL is based on PostgreSQL 9.2, so no.
Postgres-XL doesn't "run on" PostgreSQL. It's a modified (forked)
version of PostgreSQL.
> Or you can advise me any better solution.
Not without knowing a lot more about what you're trying to do, what
your requirements are, etc.
> As per my knowledge partitioning
> of a table have some limits in nos. and I can't extend more storage in a
> server upto a limit.
Yes, that's true, but those limits are quite large, and you may be
trying to solve a problem you don't and won't have.
This may well be premature optimisation. I can't know without a lot more info.
Rather than starting with the solution (horizontal partitioning,
sharding) try starting with the problem and requirements, then looking
for solutions from there.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
