On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > you can protect it against this issue with locking - in this case you can > try "for update" clause > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/explicit-locking.html > > insert into Favorite (patronId, titleId) > select 123, 234 > where not exists ( > select 1 from Favorite where patronId = 123 and titleId = 234 for update > ) That won't work reliably either -- a SELECT ... FOR UPDATE will still use an MVCC snapshot. The looping + subxact pattern must be used [1] if a duplicate violation isn't acceptable. ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE should be preferred once 9.5 is released. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-UPSERT-EXAMPLE -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
