Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Trying to avoid a simple temporary variable declaration in a pl/pgsql function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I know this could be written quite easily in sql but was wondering if it is
> possible in pl/pgsql.

> CREATE FUNCTION test_func()
> RETURNS text
> LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
> AS $$
> BEGIN
> SELECT 'text_to_return' INTO <what_goes_here?>; --with or without a cast
> RETURN <what_goes_here?>;
> END;
> $$;

> The goal is to return the value of text_to_return without declaring an
> explicit variable to name in the INTO clause.

INTO requires a declared variable as target.

However, I'm wondering why you don't just use "RETURN _expression_"
if this is all that will be in the function.


​The use of SELECT is required and will likely have a CTE and a set of SQL CASE expressions as part of it.
It isn't a problem to declare it myself but I thought I had read about there being an implicit variable name that could be used instead.  I guess I mis-remembered...

​Thanks for the quick response.

David J.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux