Thanks so much Tom!
Will J. Dunn
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
William Dunn <dunnwjr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Does anyone which is a more accurate estimate of a table's live
> rows: pg_class.reltuples (
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-class.html)
> OR pg_stat_all_tables.n_live_tup (
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/monitoring-stats.html#PG-STAT-ALL-TABLES-VIEW)?
They're both inaccurate with different sources of inaccuracy. I dunno
that you should assume that one is necessarily better than the other.
> - Is pg_class.reltuples an estimation of live tuples only, or is it of
> all tuples (both live and dead)? I would guess it's live only but that is a
> guess
Hm. I'm pretty sure the planner takes it as counting live tuples only,
but it looks like VACUUM thinks it includes recently-dead-but-not-yet-
removable tuples. We might need to do some adjustment there.
regards, tom lane
