Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> I see another hole in this area.  See do_start_worker() -- there we only
> consider the offsets limit to determine a database to be in
> almost-wrapped-around state (causing emergency attention).  If the
> database in members trouble has no pgstat entry, it might get completely
> ignored.

For the record -- it was pointed out to me that this was actually fixed
by 53bb309d2.  \o/

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux