Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-06-08 14:23:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Sure.  I just concern that we might be putting excessive trust on
> emergency workers being launched at a high pace.

I'm not sure what to do about that. I mean, it'd not be hard to simply
ignore naptime upon wraparound, but I'm not sure that'd be well
received.

> (My personal alarm bells go off when I see autovac_naptime=15min or
> more, but apparently not everybody sees things that way.)

Understandably so. I'd be alarmed at much lower values than that
actually.

> > --- 
> > Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
> 
> I wonder if these notices are useful at all.

I only know that I'm less annoyed at reading a untrimmed/badly wrapped
email if it's sent from a mobile phone, where it's hard to impossible to
write a well formatted email, than when sent from a full desktop.
That's why I added the notice...

Andres


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux