On 6/2/15, Jan de Visser <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On June 1, 2015 11:11:37 PM Arthur Silva wrote: >> In my opinion a twice a year schedule would be good. >> The LTS would be every 2 or 4 releases. Keeping 2 LTS versions supported >> at >> all moments. >> >> Maybe this should be reposted to the hackers list? > > Pretty sure this would be shot down pretty quick. At this point it seems > more > likely to me that the time between releases will be longer rather than > shorter. Really, that sounds like an excellent way to test such an alternative - if pg development went to what every other major libre project does, we would not have a proper comparison of the outcome for the alternative (lengthening the release cycle, rather than shortening). I know how I think it'll pan out - but personal opions matter little here, only what the dev's choose. Whatever the outcome, this will be a great experiment in the long run, providing a data point we would be quite unlikely to have otherwise! Regards, Zenaan -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
