On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:23:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:10:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Is there a reason the following patch wasn't applied? > > >> I don't think anybody ever did the legwork to verify it was a good idea. > >> In particular, it'd be good to check if sending a tabstat message for each > >> table adds noticeable overhead. > > > OK, I will mark it as closed then. Thanks. > > I don't know that it should be closed exactly --- if we don't do this, > we should do something else about the performance issue. Maybe put it > on TODO? Thanks, TODO added: Reduce memory use when analyzing many tables (This is part of my clean up of old issues in preparation for 9.5 feature freeze.) -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
