Hi, I noticed an inaccuracy in the transaction isolation docs. Under the Repeatable Read Isolation Level section it states: “The Repeatable Read isolation level only sees data committed before the transaction began; it never sees either uncommitted data or changes committed during transaction execution by concurrent transactions.” That is not entirely accurate. The snapshot starts with the first SQL statement in the transaction, not at the start of the transaction. Any change that is committed in another transaction after the start of the transaction but before the first SQL statement will be seen. Brad. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
