Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Benchmarking partitioning triggers and rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/07/2015 07:49 PM, Tim Uckun wrote:
I understand that there is overhead involved in parsing the strings and
such.  The amount of overhead was surprising to me but that's another
matter.  What I am really puzzled about is the difference between the
statements

EXECUTE  'INSERT INTO ' ||  quote_ident(partition_name) ||  ' SELECT
($1).*' USING NEW ;

and

   EXECUTE  'INSERT INTO ' ||  quote_ident(partition_name) ||  ' VALUES
(($1).*)' USING NEW ;


Offhand I would say because in the first case you are doing a SELECT and in the second you are just doing a substitution.


They both do string interpolation but one is significantly faster than
the other.   Is there a third and even faster way?

I am using RDS so I can't really do stored procs in C.



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux