Search Postgresql Archives

Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James,

* James Cloos (cloos@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> I've for some time used:
> 
>    (now()::timestamp without time zone - 'epoch'::timestamp without time zone)::reltime::integer
> 
> to get the current seconds since the epoch.  The results are consistant
> with date +%s.
> 
> (Incidently, is there a better way in 9.4?)

Uh, select extract('epoch' from now()); ?

> But I found the 'epoch'::timestamp + $THAT_VALUE::reltime was off.
> 
> I consitantly get 1970-01-01 06:00 plus a fraction of a second from:
> 
> select now() -  ((now()::timestamp without time zone - 'epoch'::timestamp without time zone)::reltime::integer)::reltime;
> 
> The machines on which I've tried it all have localtime == UTC.
> 
> Am I missing something obvious?

The only thing I'd say about this is that you *really* want to use
timestamptz in PG for storing timestamps.

> Also, is there any way to get the equiv of date +%s%N as a numeric or a
> double precision?

See above.

	Thanks!

		Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux