Search Postgresql Archives

Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/09/2015 08:49 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
pinker <pinker@xxxxxxx> wrote:

INFO:  vacuuming "my_table"
INFO:  "my_table": found 0 removable, 3043947 nonremovable row versions in 37580 pages
DETAIL:  0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.

So there are no longer any dead rows being left behind, right?

Why are we still discussing this?  Do you have some other question?

Well from the original post:

"I have deleted a large number of records from my_table, which originally had 288 MB. Then I ran vacuum full to make the table size smaller. After this operation size of the table remains the same, despite of the fact that table contains now only 241 rows and after rewriting it in classic way: CREATE TABLE new_table AS SELECT * FROM old_table - new_table size is 24kB. "

So I think the question remains how is 241 rows = 3043947 nonremovable row versions? And that number is an increase from the original number which was 2989662 nonremovable row versions.


--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company




--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux