> Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits the GROUP > > BY as implicitly grouping by all the columns that aren't part of an aggregate? I'm Mr. Curious today ... Why would you think that such a thing is necessary or desirable? Simply add the columns to the GROUP BY clause and make the request unambiguous. -- Bill Moran -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
