Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Building extensions against OpenSCG RPM packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/29/2015 04:36 AM, Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hello list,
What are your experiences with OpenSCG’s RPM packages?  It is my
impression that those packages allow vanilla PostgreSQL to run, but
trying to build extensions such as PostGIS against them fails in most
(two out of three) cases due to problems with the included shared libraries.
The “two out of three cases” means that I tried three of their packages,
then basically gave up on those OpenSCG packages as one “builds out of
the box” success out of three seemed a bit on the low side.  Is that
“success rate” about correct, or could I have picked the only two
packages with such problems?
Of course, OpenSCG’s “selling points” (packages have been relocatable
since around 2011, and are largely independent of the Linux distribution
due to extra libraries supplied) did sound good, so you might still
consider OpenSCG’s packages if you just want to run “vanilla” PostgreSQL.
As I mentioned, in one case building PostGIS against the installed
PostgreSQL worked out of the box;  in one case building a PostGIS
extension didn’t work against the libraries supplied by OpenSCG, but
after copying around some system libraries things both built and ran
fine;  one case was even weirder in that an initial build succeeded but
produced a shared library that would error out at run time, and copying
over some system libraries resulted in a state in which the build
succeeded AND produced a working shared library (see the earlier
discussion about that weird case:
_http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/C5DBACC6DCC7604C9E4875FD9C7968B1129DF47A16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.de_;
it was compounded by the problem that just copying over just one system
library didn’t work at all, and as it turned out, I also needed to copy
over a dependency).
Figuring out which system libraries to copy over can be sort of fun if
you have a little development background, but database administrators
may shy away from copying bunches of shared libraries around.  What
could be going wrong here?  How can a shared library allow things to run
fine but prevent things from building against it?

From what I gather it is static binary package built against libraries at a point in time in a distribution that may or may not be in exact sync with the distribution you are running. Which is fine when you run it by itself. Then you try to 'merge' it with a package that comes from another source. Most of the time the close enough rule will apply and things will work. When it does not you get the above. If you want less drama I would say stick with your distributions repo or use the Postgres RPM repo:

http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/

Or, build from source.

Holger Friedrich


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux