Search Postgresql Archives

Re: sslmode verify-ca and verify-full: essentialy the same?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah! So there was my error! Should be good to explain this in the
official libpq documentation, don't you think? If I correctly read, the
connection string as source of the hostname isn't explicit, there is
only the mention that libpq will check that the responding server is
“the one I specify”. Once I know that it means “the one I specify in the
connection string”, it's all clear, but, IMHO, there's still a doubt
when you don't know what that does mean.

Anyway, thanks for your help, Magnus.

Regards.

Le mardi 27 janvier 2015 à 14:37 +0100, Magnus Hagander a écrit : 
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David Guyot
> <david.guyot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         Hi, there.
>         
>         Firstly, as this is my first post on a PgSQL ML, I hope this
>         ML is the
>         good one for my question.
>         
>         I'm trying to secure further some PgSQL servers and am reading
>         documentation about libpq sslmode option. I have a question
>         about that:
>         as I understand the internals of this option, the difference
>         between
>         verify-ca and verify-full is that, for verify-full, client
>         will compare
>         the hostname the server gave and the one in the SSL
>         certificate, and
>         will give up if these two values differ. Am I right up to
>         now? 
> 
> 
> Almost correct. It will compare the hostname that the client used (in
> the connection string) with the hostname in the SSL certificate, and
> give up if the two values differ.
> 
> 
> The server does not give the client a hostname at any point (other
> than the CN of the certificate).
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         If I'm right, I feel like the extra security of verify-full
>         compared to
>         verify-ca is merely a smoke screen because, as far as I know,
>         nothing
>         prevents a crafted server to read the certificate's hostname
>         and give
>         this one as its own, and the libpq shouldn't show a better
>         MitM
>         protection with verify-full than with verify-ca. If I'm wrong,
>         where am
>         I wrong? How does libpq verify the server's name? Reverse DNS?
>         Other
>         mean? 
> 
> 
> libpq uses the hostname that you specify in the connection string (or
> in an environment variable, or however you end up specifying it).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  Magnus Hagander
>  Me: http://www.hagander.net/
>  Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
David Guyot
Administrateur système, réseau et télécom / Sysadmin
Europe Camions Interactive / Stockway
Moulin Collot
F-88500 Ambacourt
03 29 30 47 85

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux