On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ronald Peterson <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I added a 'raise notice' to a plpgsql function I was working on
> recently, and noticed that my notification was being raised more often
> than I'd expect. The notification is raised in a function ('getone'
> in my example below) that returns a single composite value. This
> function is then called by another function ('getset') that returns a
> setof that composite value. It appears that 'getone' is called once
> for each column of my composite type. I whittled this down to the
> following example.
>
> I get the expected result from my query. But it appears to me (and
> what do I know) that perhaps something inefficient is happening in the
> way this query is running. Or maybe this is doing exactly what it
> should, in which case this is just a curiosity question - I don't
> understand why my 'getone' notice is called twice as often as I'd
> expect.
This was answered pretty clearly above. The problem is (func()).*
syntax and how it's expanded in the query. This was a longstanding
issue with set returning functions until 9.3 nailed it completely with
LATERAL. Consider (func()).* to be deprecated syntax.
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
