David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It was also mentioned that using the Perl encoding function was > non-performant; which is why caching the data into a memoization table has > value. I find it hard to believe that the standards folk would have chosen a hostname encoding method that was so inefficient that memoization using a database table would outperform just recomputing the encoding. What I suspect the above really means is "man, this Perl code sucks". regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
