Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PL/Python prepare example's use of setdefault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/15/2014 05:51 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 02:39 PM, Jonathan Rogers wrote:
>> I was just reading the PL/Python docs section "42.7.1 Database Access
>> Functions" and saw this example:
>>
>> CREATE FUNCTION usesavedplan() RETURNS trigger AS $$
>>      plan = SD.setdefault("plan", plpy.prepare("SELECT 1"))
>>      # rest of function
>> $$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
>>
>> The above example uses the plpy.prepare() function, reusing the result
>> across function calls uses setdefault(). Unfortunately, since
>> setdefault() is a method on dict objects, the values passed to it must
>> be evaluated before it can be called. Therefore, plpy.prepare() will be
>> called every time usesavedplan() executes whether a result already
>> exists in the SD dict or not.
>>
>> I'm not sure if it's a problem that plpy.prepare() is called every time
>> since the result is discarded if a prepared statement had been cached by
>> a previous execution of usesavedplan(). It seems that some wasted
>> processing will occur, but maybe not enough to matter. The documentation
>> for SPI_prepare() does not clearly state what tasks that function
>> performs other than constructing a prepared statement object. It seems
>> to imply that parsing does occur within SPI_prepare(). It does state
>> that query planning occurs within SPI_execute_plan().
>>
>> Can anyone clarify what occurs when plpy.prepare() is called? Is it
>> worth using a Python conditional to determine whether to call it rather
>> than using SD.setdefault()?
> 
> Like in the older documentation?:
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/plpython-database.html
> 
> CREATE FUNCTION usesavedplan() RETURNS trigger AS $$
>     if SD.has_key("plan"):
>         plan = SD["plan"]
>     else:
>         plan = plpy.prepare("SELECT 1")
>         SD["plan"] = plan
>     # rest of function
> $$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
> 

Exactly. It seems to me that the approach taken by the newer
documentation will be less efficient. If so, why was the example
changed? BTW, I would rewrite the 9.1 example to be shorter while
behaving the same:


CREATE FUNCTION usesavedplan() RETURNS trigger AS $$
    plan = SD.get("plan")
    if plan is None:
        SD["plan"] = plan = plpy.prepare("SELECT 1")
    # rest of function
$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;


-- 
Jonathan Ross Rogers


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux