På søndag 21. september 2014 kl. 16:10:54, skrev Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 09/21/2014 06:50 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På søndag 21. september 2014 kl. 15:48:00, skrev Adrian Klaver
> <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>>:
>
> On 09/21/2014 05:44 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > På søndag 21. september 2014 kl. 13:51:00, skrev Bill Moran
> > <wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>:
> >
>
> >
> > I see this limitation in Slyny:
> > http://slony.info/documentation/2.2/limitations.html
> >
> > Slony-I does not automatically replicate
> >
> > *
> >
> > Changes to large objects (BLOBS)
> >
> > *
> >
> > Changes made by DDL commands
> >
> > *
> >
> > Changes to users and roles
> >
> > Not being able to replicate BLOBS is a show-stopper for me as we have
> > lots of them.
>
> Well I would say it depends on where you are storing the binary data, in
> large objects or in a bytea column? If you are using bytea columns then
> you would be okay. If it is large objects then you have a problem.
>
> Large-objects, not BYTEA, as they allow for much more efficient
> streaming (require less memory).
Here are some other suggestions from the project, though they are
cluster wide(including PITR):
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/backup-file.html
I think the rsync-approach is the most attractive option.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
