Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/17/2014 11:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

But here's the *key* reason: if pl/java is failing to stay afloat as
an external project, that is a terrible reason for pulling it into
core.  It suggests strongly that the manpower or interest to keep it
going simply doesn't exist.

This is really all that needs to be said, IMO. If it's not in core now, after *several years* of existing in various states of completeness on its own... it probably isn't going to be. If there can't be a solid deployment process *independent* of whatever state Java is in at any arbitrary moment, it has no business being in core.

This is clearly a third-party module effort, as are many on PGXN. That is fine, honestly. What is wrong with something being an external module? Why does everything, including the kitchen sink of Java, need to be in core?

It sounds like Mr. Cowwoc has some kind of issue with the maintainers of Pl/Java, and he should take it up with them.

--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse, LLC | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux