On 2014-09-15 19:54:42 +0200, pba@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Is it already possible or would you consider a configuration option that > would only replicate DML but not DDL ? > > This should of course be combined with a predictable way of manually > handling DDL errors. Like simply manually adding any missing DDL on the > "slave". As Christoph wrote this pretty much is already possible. Even if it could be prettier. What I'd like to know is what the exact use case you want it for is. Could you quickly explain? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
