Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Database block lifecycle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Database block lifecycle
From: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:23:17 -0700
Cc: "pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1407917229708-5814672.post@n5.nabble.com>

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:07 AM, pinker <pinker@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>>
>> btw. 512MB if we assume up to 600 connection is a reasonable value?
>>
>
>>Reasonable value for what?
>

> For normal server load.

512MB is being questioned as a reasonable value for what? shared_buffers? work_mem? maintenance_work_mem?

Cheers,

Jeff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Database block lifecycle
  - From: Robin

References:
- Database block lifecycle
  - From: pinker
- Re: Database block lifecycle
  - From: Jeff Janes
- Re: Database block lifecycle
  - From: pinker

Prev by Date: Re: PostgreSQL as a triple store
Next by Date: Re: Database block lifecycle
Previous by thread: Re: Database block lifecycle
Next by thread: Re: Database block lifecycle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux