Search Postgresql Archives

Postgresql 9.3 tuning advice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello all,

Iam running a postgresql 9.0.13 master/slave instance in a write heavy 
workload. 

The hardware is a Dell 720, E5530 - 8 core, 128GB RAM. The database (around 
250g with indexes/bloat etc) is sitting on flashcache device with 2 fusion-
io PCIe MLC SSDs as frontend and a MD3200 based RAID10 (14*1TB SATA disks) 
as backend. OS is centos 6.2 with kernel 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64.

Currently, the performance related configuration is mostly default i,e shared_buffers,
effective_cache_size. The only directive that seems different is 
checkpoint_segments = 96

Iam moving to postgresql 9.3 shortly and planning to tune the above 
directives as below..

effective_cache_size = 100GB # free+buffers is pretty consistent around 110 
to 120GB and pg_oscache_total is around 80GB 
checkpoint_segments = 32 # 96 seems to long and all flushes seem to be only 
due to checkpoint_timeout with the older value

Additionally iam turning off THB defrag on the OS as suggested by some posts on the 
lists. Though, My initial pgbench testing doesn't seem to indicate any 
issues with THB defrag turned on/off. 

Iam not sure about shared_buffers and wal_buffers for this HW/OS & DB combination - iam inclined to leave 
them to defaults. But based on this article 
(http://rhaas.blogspot.in/2012/03/tuning-sharedbuffers-and-walbuffers.html
it looks there will be some advantages in tuning it 

What would be a good value (to start with atleast) for shared_buffers and wal_buffers ?

Please let me know if additional information will help.

TIA
dushy


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux