David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > While I agree with the sentiment unless someone can present a reason why > allowing and then ignoring a she-bang is a terrible idea then this seems > like a case for letting end-users decide what is best for themselves. The > issue then is that apparently this isn't exactly high on anyone's list of > ToDo items so unless the OP or one of the +1 people are willing to supply a > patch the odds that it gets done decreases quite quickly. It's not just that it's "not high on anyone's priority list", it's that we'd want to be sure that the patch didn't break any existing use-cases or make things unmaintainable. (This isn't exactly a negligible concern considering that Postgres thinks #! is a legal operator name.) The proposal seems a bit reminiscent of the requests we've had for psql to ignore a UTF8 byte-order mark (BOM) at the start of an input file. The details are considerably different of course, but anyone who wants to push this idea should probably read the archives to see why that idea still hasn't made it in. regards, tom lane
