Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Wall <d.wall@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 7/4/2014 7:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You haven't given us much info about the contents of this database.
>> Are there a lot of tables? functions? large objects?  How many is
>> "a lot", if so?

> There are only 32 table, no functions, but mostly large objects. Not 
> sure how to know about the LOs, but a quick check from the table sizes I 
> estimate at only 2GB, so 16GB could be LOs.  There are 7,528,803 entries 
> in pg_catalog.pg_largeobject.

Hmm ... how many rows in pg_largeobject_metadata?

> Basic top stats while running show:

>   7547 esignfor  30  10 1148m 1.0g  852 S  2.3 26.9 14:10.27 pg_dump 
> --format=c --oids ibc01

That's a pretty large resident size for pg_dump :-( ... you evidently
have a lot of objects of some sort, and I'm betting it's LOs, but
let's make sure.

			regards, tom lane



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux