Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/03/14 22:51, David Wall wrote:
> 
> It just seems odd that pg_dump is slower than pg_restore to me. Most 
> grumblings I read about suggest that pg_restore is too slow.
> 
> I have noted that the last split file segment will often appear to be 
> done -- no file modifications -- while pg_dump is still running, often 
> for another 20 minutes or so, and then some last bit is finally 
> written.  It's as if pg_dump is calculating something at the end that is 
> quite slow.  At startup, there's a delay before data is written, too, 
> but it's generally 1-2 minutes at most.

Random thought:  What OS & kernel are you running?  Kernels between
3.2.x and 3.9.x were known to have IO scheduling issues.  This was
highlighted most by the kernel in Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) as shown
here:

<http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/50BF9247.2010800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Bosco.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux