Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [DOCS] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Amit Langote wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > And it also tells you how to stop it --bibtex iirc
>>
>> Yeah, it's a caution against a potentially harmful usage anyway. Users
>> should not use it at all.
>>
>> I was just wondering if the description of the behavior, that is,
>> potential disappearance of certain locks is complete enough.
>
> You do realize that this is no longer the case in 9.3, right?
> I don't see a point in changing old releases' documentation.

I see, okay.
And yes, I'm aware that this's no longer an issue in 9.3.

Thanks,
Amit


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux