I browsed through messages related to this issue? I have a few questions to the OP. How did you upgrade? Did you reindex the database? Try reindexdb and see what happens. If you used pg_upgrade, you need to reindex. I did pg_upgrade on my production db and it wasn't any faster on 9.3 than on 9.0, until I re-indexed.
-Joseph
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/24/2014 07:32 PM, Álvaro Nunes Lemos Melo wrote:
Jeff: I ran a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE and retested. No significative change
was notices, the explain is availiable in
9.3 - After VACUUM FULL ANALYZE - http://explain.depesz.com/s/rVoW
9.3 - Original - http://explain.depesz.com/s/Vwt
Adrian: I'll try to send the query attached. My doubts are: why 9.3 is
slower then 9.2 with the same database/configuration/harware/query? Even
worst, why 9.3 got slower results on a better HW, where 9.2 improved on
the same scenario.
Yikes, that query is above my level of expertise. Someone with more knowledge of the planner than I is going to have to go over that. As to why the change? Best guess, something changed in the planner and this query is on the wrong side of the change. So are you seeing a general slowdown or is it restricted to this particular query?
I've just ran the explains on my new server, links below:
9.2 - http://explain.depesz.com/s/AeD
9.3 - http://explain.depesz.com/s/1sp
For comparison sake, old server:
9.2 -http://explain.depesz.com/s/bXIo
9.3 -http://explain.depesz.com/s/Vwt<http://explain.depesz.com/s/Vwt>
I really appreciate your help.
Thanks again,
--
Álvaro Nunes Melo Atua Sistemas de Informação
alvaro@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.atua.com.br
(54) 9976-0106 (54) 3045-4144
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
