Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Increase in max_connections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/11/2014 10:20 AM, Anand Kumar, Karthik wrote:
We typically see about 500-700 active queries at a time

if these are primarily small/fast queries, like OLTP operations, and you DONT have 200-400 CPU cores on this server, you will likely find that if you use a queueing mechanism to only execute about 2X your CPU core count concurrently, you will get MORE total transactions/second than trying to do 500-700 at once.

if your apps are using persistent connections, then the session pooling model won't do any good, you should use transaction pooling. you want the actual active query count to be tunable, probably down around 2X the cpu core count, depending on various things. some folks say, CPU cores/threads plus disk spindles is the optimal number.



--
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux