Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/04/2014 01:52 PM, AlexK wrote:
Every row of my table has a double[] array of approximately 30K numbers. I
have ran a few tests, and so far everything looks good.

I am not pushing the limits here, right? It should be perfectly fine to
store arrays of 30k double numbers, correct?



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-reasonable-to-store-double-arrays-of-30K-elements-tp5790562.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


What sorts of tests and what sorts of results?
Each record has something like 30000*16 + 30000*(per cell overhead, which could be zero) but that is definitely spilling over to toast.  Have you done any large scale deletes?



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux